What next
Global Rank: 198
Totalscore: 110647
Posts: 1795
Thanks: 1390
UpVotes: 961
Registered: 18y 258d
Last Seen: 64d 17h
The User is Offline
What next
Jun 03, 2014 - 02:40:26 (12y 152d)
Jun 03, 2014 - 02:40:26 (12y 152d)
So i was wondering what should be done next to wechall.
Please vote.
The outcome of the voting is never shown, and you need a few points to be allowed to vote.
Also, more ideas and suggestions are warmheartly welcome.
Happy Challenging!
gizmore
EDIT: Post moved to public visibility, as the vote is created now.
EDIT2: Funny, i cannot see the outcome myself via web... typical GWF3 code
EDIT3: Funny, the thread had the old gid from a board where i edited this thread for for the vote first
Please vote.
The outcome of the voting is never shown, and you need a few points to be allowed to vote.
Also, more ideas and suggestions are warmheartly welcome.
Happy Challenging!
gizmore
EDIT: Post moved to public visibility, as the vote is created now.
EDIT2: Funny, i cannot see the outcome myself via web... typical GWF3 code
EDIT3: Funny, the thread had the old gid from a board where i edited this thread for for the vote first
The geeks shall inherit the properties and methods of object earth.
Last edited by gizmore - Jun 03, 2014 - 03:05:31
Global Rank: 109
Totalscore: 173510
Posts: 100
Thanks: 108
UpVotes: 70
Registered: 17y 40d
Last Seen: 5y 312d
The User is Offline
RE: What next
Jun 03, 2014 - 20:14:47 (12y 151d)
Jun 03, 2014 - 20:14:47 (12y 151d)
My personal opinion: I like wechall alot and how it functions. But, somehow the UI is still a little cold. Maybe it is because this UI existed for more than a decade. It may need a fresh look.
Other than that, the functionality is great.
Other than that, the functionality is great.
Global Rank: 339
Totalscore: 72262
Posts: 25
Thanks: 25
UpVotes: 18
Registered: 13y 26d
Last Seen: 1y 204d
The User is Offline
RE: What next
Jun 04, 2014 - 03:15:33 (12y 151d)
Jun 04, 2014 - 03:15:33 (12y 151d)
The GUI's color scheme is ok. After all I like the look... no need to use "modern" design when what's currently on the site looks awesome. Maybe some sections need to be modified a bit, but there should not be a big design change, both GUI and colour schema related, if you ask me.
To give an example of "modern" design that some site are using and it is totally against UX: shadow on every piece of text. I even have an example of this bad practice (it's hurting eyes): RoseCode. Sharp fonts will always win.
To improve UX maybe some sections can be AJAXed. For example Reply/Preview forum post.
To give an example of "modern" design that some site are using and it is totally against UX: shadow on every piece of text. I even have an example of this bad practice (it's hurting eyes): RoseCode. Sharp fonts will always win.
To improve UX maybe some sections can be AJAXed. For example Reply/Preview forum post.
Global Rank: 215
Totalscore: 101829
Posts: 65
Thanks: 67
UpVotes: 44
Registered: 17y 284d
The User is Offline
RE: What next
Jun 04, 2014 - 16:07:10 (12y 150d)
Jun 04, 2014 - 16:07:10 (12y 150d)
maybe a few more training but not really needed.
my only problem with the site itself is mobile(samsung wave),
the right side info panels cover every 9 out of 10 pages, either that or the text is squashed and wrapped to 3 letters a line lol.
could be a slight design glitch or just my old(unupdatable) phone.
perhaps add user controlled layout preference to profile settings?(choose which panels to display and where.)
my only problem with the site itself is mobile(samsung wave),
the right side info panels cover every 9 out of 10 pages, either that or the text is squashed and wrapped to 3 letters a line lol.
could be a slight design glitch or just my old(unupdatable) phone.
perhaps add user controlled layout preference to profile settings?(choose which panels to display and where.)
quangntenemy, TheHiveMind, Z, balicocat, Ge0, arraez, jcquinterov, hophuocthinh, alfamen2, burhanudinn123, Ben_Dover, stephanduran89, braddie0, fpombal, csuquvq have subscribed to this thread and receive emails on new posts.
1 people are watching the thread at the moment.
This thread has been viewed 16842 times.
1 people are watching the thread at the moment.
This thread has been viewed 16842 times.