Comments on osix
Posizione globale: 7175
Punteggio totale: 1803
Posts : 4
Grazie: 6
Voti+: 2
Registrato: 17a 35gg
Ultima visita: 15a 364gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
16 Gen 2010 - 17:19:44 (16a 292gg)
16 Gen 2010 - 17:19:44 (16a 292gg)
Thanks to BAAL and gizmore for spotting a bug in the maxscore on the osix.net site.
I've updated the links, and now the calculations are coming out correctly. Keep plugging away .. we need a 100% guy to top our list!
I've updated the links, and now the calculations are coming out correctly. Keep plugging away .. we need a 100% guy to top our list!
Posizione globale: 52
Punteggio totale: 271416
Posts : 60
Grazie: 61
Voti+: 32
Registrato: 18a 213gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
17 Mar 2010 - 22:11:03 (16a 231gg)
17 Mar 2010 - 22:11:03 (16a 231gg)
It seems that the recovery password doesn't work...
Posizione globale: 31813
Punteggio totale: 0
Posts : 7
Grazie: 7
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
Ultima visita: 16a 225gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 01:51:18 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 01:51:18 (16a 226gg)
because they were complete douchbags after i in confidence reported bugs to them that leaked their entire database to the world. it wasn't the first bug i reported either.
http://no.solutions.here
i'll probably take the time soon to do full writeups of the challenges.
they also (temporarily) disabled signups, which if takes too long is probably grounds to remove the challenge site from this network, since there is no point in having unplayable challenge sites now is there.
http://no.solutions.here
i'll probably take the time soon to do full writeups of the challenges.
they also (temporarily) disabled signups, which if takes too long is probably grounds to remove the challenge site from this network, since there is no point in having unplayable challenge sites now is there.
Ultima modifica: gizmore - 23 Mar 2010 - 10:47:29
Posizione globale: 5421
Punteggio totale: 3061
Posts : 6
Grazie: 6
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 04:34:13 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 04:34:13 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: sajchurchey - 23 Mar 2010 - 06:08:52
Posizione globale: 31813
Punteggio totale: 0
Posts : 7
Grazie: 7
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
Ultima visita: 16a 225gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 04:39:13 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 04:39:13 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: justtemp - 23 Mar 2010 - 05:29:04
Posizione globale: 5421
Punteggio totale: 3061
Posts : 6
Grazie: 6
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 04:40:07 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 04:40:07 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: sajchurchey - 23 Mar 2010 - 06:08:39
Posizione globale: 31813
Punteggio totale: 0
Posts : 7
Grazie: 7
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
Ultima visita: 16a 225gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 04:45:39 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 04:45:39 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: justtemp - 23 Mar 2010 - 05:29:33
Posizione globale: 5421
Punteggio totale: 3061
Posts : 6
Grazie: 6
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 04:57:03 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 04:57:03 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: sajchurchey - 23 Mar 2010 - 06:08:15
Posizione globale: 31813
Punteggio totale: 0
Posts : 7
Grazie: 7
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
Ultima visita: 16a 225gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 05:10:05 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 05:10:05 (16a 226gg)
Ultima modifica: justtemp - 23 Mar 2010 - 05:30:08
Posizione globale: 5421
Punteggio totale: 3061
Posts : 6
Grazie: 6
Voti+: 5
Registrato: 16a 226gg
L'utente è Offline
Comments on osix
23 Mar 2010 - 05:21:08 (16a 226gg)
23 Mar 2010 - 05:21:08 (16a 226gg)
Your comment was not relevant or even constructive. Yeah the article said it was Part II when there was no part I a simple editorial mistake that was easily fixed. You were just being picky so you could harass our members. No the author didn't give you credit because he didn't have to, it's not a requirement, and it has nothing to do with us. No the comments don't "carry over" sorry not my fault or a big concern of ours or anyone else for that matter.
If people want to cheat, let them it's a challenge site and they would only be cheating themselves out of a good learning experience. We'll get rid of cheater accounts just like we got rid of yours. You can waste time trolling if you like because nobody will be paying any attention to you anymore.
Good night
If people want to cheat, let them it's a challenge site and they would only be cheating themselves out of a good learning experience. We'll get rid of cheater accounts just like we got rid of yours. You can waste time trolling if you like because nobody will be paying any attention to you anymore.
Good night
Ultima modifica: sajchurchey - 23 Mar 2010 - 06:10:44
tunelko, feicuijade, quangntenemy, TheHiveMind, Z, balicocat, Ge0, arraez, jcquinterov, hophuocthinh, alfamen2, burhanudinn123, Ben_Dover, stephanduran89, braddie0, fpombal, csuquvq utenti hanno sottoscritto il thread e ricevo le E-Mail di notifica.
1 persone stanno visualizzando il thread.
Questo thread è stato visualizzato 57801 volte.
1 persone stanno visualizzando il thread.
Questo thread è stato visualizzato 57801 volte.